I found this
week’s lectures to be very interesting, mainly because I had touched on this
topic briefly in my last post concerning robotics. This week’s topic focuses on
the technological advances made in the medical field and how it relates to art
(Vesna). My interpretation of the connection between the medical field and art
is much more obvious than my interpretation of the connection between science
and art. This is because I do not view medicine as a pure science. True,
medicine is the study of science, but the practice of medicine can be described
as applied science and much more of an art form than other sciences (Panda). As
Professor Vesna mentioned in lecture, one of the connections made between
medicine and art was in plastic surgery.
![]() |
Cosmetic Plastic Surgery |
Some may see plastic surgery as an art
because it allows the artist, the surgeon, to sculpt a new face from the model,
the patient. According to Holland Cotter of the New York Times, “The human body
is their medium, the operating room their studio. The tools of their craft
include multifarious cutting, clamping, probing and sewing devices, as well as
digital and laser technologies. Most of the work that results is a living art.
It can be seen walking among us in the form of revamped and – this is, of
course, the point – improved faces and figures.” In my opinion, this sentiment
gives art a bad name. Growing up, I was taught to value individuality and
embracing natural beauty. However, using plastic surgery as a form of art seems
to be overstepping some boundaries.
This can be seen with Orlan’s Reincarnation
of Saint-Orlan project. Orlan underwent numerous surgeries in order to achieve
the beauty portrayed by the portraits of famous artists. I do not believe this
is art, but rather a superficial attempt at art. Plastic surgery has evolved as
an art form in that doctors are finding new and efficient medical procedures
using their imagination. These procedures are used to help burn victims,
domestic violence victims, and other wounded victims (American Society of Plastic
Surgeons) and should not be made a mockery as in Orlan’s case.
Thus, I do believe that medicine can be considered an art form but that there is a fine line.
The Reincarnation of Saint-Orlan |
![]() |
Reconstructive Plastic Surgery on Cleft Lip and Palate |
Thus, I do believe that medicine can be considered an art form but that there is a fine line.
Citations
Cotter, Holland.
“Artist’s Life: Cut, Nip and Tuck.” The
New York Times. 19 Arp. 2009. Web.
Panda, S.C.
“Medicine: Science or Art?” Mens Sana
Monographs 4.1(2006): 127-38. Print.
“Reconstructive
Procedures.” American Society of Plastic
Surgeons. Web.
Rose, Barbara.
“Orlan: Is it Art? Orlan and the Transgressive Act.” Stanford. 2 Feb. 1993. Web.
Vesna, Victoria.
“Unit Four: MedTech + Art.” 2012. Web.
i think the connection between art and medicine and technology are amazing, especially when writer used plastic surgery to exemplify the relationship between these three elements. I agree with you when you said plastic surgery is a superficial attempt on art because it really helped lots of victims from accident or birth defect. Nowadays, when people talked about plastic surgery, they would mostly think of people who pursue beauty of appearance but they forgot the real meaning of plastic surgery is to give a second chance to unfortunate. Before this lecture, i have never thought that medicine is part of art but now I have a brand new perspective towards medicine and art.
ReplyDelete